Oliverson Law DUI & Criminal Defense – Experienced DUI Lawyer Arizona: Defenses for DUI Charges in Phoenix

Do not let a DUI case ruin your life. If you face DUI charges, an experienced DUI lawyer in Arizona can help you construct a solid defense against your DUI allegations.  Attorney Derek Oliverson is a former DUI judge, prosecutor, and police officer.

Field Sobriety Tests & Trying to Prove You Are Impaired 

Under ARS 28-1381(A)(1), the law does not require the person to have a specific amount of a substance (alcohol or drugs) in their system (however, if a person has a BAC of .08 or greater in their system, there is a rebuttable presumption that the person is impaired). Rather, this is a factual determination, and law enforcement will identify factors that they feel are indicative of someone being impaired.

The Significance of Blood Alcohol Concentration within Two Hours of Driving

Under ARS 28-1381(A)(2), to be convicted, a person must have a Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of 0.08 or greater within two hours of driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle.

Alcohol consumption that places the person above a 0.08 BAC must have been consumed before the person drove or was in actual physical control of the vehicle. Indeed, if a person consumes alcohol after driving during that two-hour window, generally prior to being contacted by law enforcement, the State will likely not obtain a conviction and may be hard-pressed to go forward.

Also, there may be an issue if law enforcement did not obtain the sample of breath or blood within two hours of the person driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle. This is most likely the case if the person’s BAC is close to the 0.08 threshold.

However, law enforcement, through their criminalists, will be able to do a “retrograde,” and relate-back the BAC to within two hours of driving, and may even give an opinion as to what the BAC was a the time of driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle. Law enforcement makes this determination based on a general elimination rate of alcohol in the human body.

However, other factors should be considered that law enforcement does not always have access to, including when the person last ate, what the person last ate, how much the person had to drink, what the person had to drink, when the person had their first drink, and when they consumed their last drink.

Law enforcement will attempt to obtain this information out of a person during a DUI “interview.” This will make their retrograde more accurate or reliable.

A person under investigation should always consult an Arizona DUI lawyer immediately before the investigation starts, if possible. Through a quick consultation, a person will be advised that they must provide a sample of their blood, breath, or urine, but that they can refuse the field sobriety tests and the portable breath test in the field, and refuse to answer questions with the exception of providing their real name and identification. It will never work to anybody’s advantage to lie to law enforcement. However, a lie is not necessary when someone has a right to remain silent.

You Might Lose Your License

It is important to know that after the traffic stop, law enforcement will either release the person or place them under arrest for DUI and transport them to either the police department, jail, or a DUI van.

Upon arrival, the law enforcement officer will read the Admin Per Se/Implied Consent Affidavit. This affidavit will inform the person that they must submit to a test of their blood, breath, or urine (at the law enforcement officer’s discretion). If the BAC comes back at 0.08 percent or greater, the person will lose their Arizona driving privileges for ninety days. However, the Admin Per Se/Implied Consent Affidavit will also instruct that if the person refuses to submit to the specified test, they will lose their license for twelve months.  It is vital that your attorney request a hearing within 15 days of you being served with the Admin Per Se Affidavit so that the suspension is paused and you are able to fight it at the MVD Executive Hearing Office.  At Oliverson Law DUI & Criminal Defense, all of our DUI representations include us representing you with MVD as well as in the court.

What You Should Know About the Intoxilyzer Breath Test

The State generally obtains breath samples from people through the use of the intoxilyzer breath test. The intox is an machine used to analyze the alcohol content in a person’s breath.

When a person consumes alcohol, the alcohol enters into the person’s bloodstream.

Oxygen-rich blood circulates the lungs, which translates into the Intox being able to read the alcohol concentration blown out through someone’s breath.

The State must adequately maintain the Intox, and quality assurance and periodic maintenance records must be kept memorializing the periodic checks. Further, the law enforcement officer must go through a specific checklist and specific protocol from the time they see the “vehicle in motion” to the time they complete the investigation. For example, there must be a “deprivation period” provided (where law enforcement ensures the person does not regurgitate, put anything in their mouth, etc.) before having the person submit to the breath test.

Law enforcement sometimes takes shortcuts with this and will count the deprivation period as occurring when the officer is driving and the person is in the back seat, not fully being observed by the officer. Further, some specifics must be present for a breath test to be admissible in trial. It is essential to consult with an experienced attorney, as DUI investigations and prosecutions can be complex, with numerous issues not known by people inexperienced in these matters.

A Few Words About Drug or Drug Metabolite DUI

This is known as a “drug DUI.” Although there is no doubt there are significant numbers of arrests for driving under the influence of marijuana, heroin, methamphetamine, and other street drugs, this type of offense is commonly prosecuted in situations where people are prescribed the drugs.

A prescription for a drug will serve as a defense under this specific section ARS 28-1381(A)(3). However, pursuant to ARS 28-1381(B), it is not a defense to an “A(1)” or an “impairment to the slightest degree” DUI that the person is or has been entitled to use the drug under Arizona law. As such, even if a prescription is in place, a person cannot operate a motor vehicle in the State of Arizona if that prescription drug impairs their ability to operate a vehicle to the slightest degree.

In a “drug” DUI, there is not a specific threshold cutoff (like a 0.08 for alcohol). The result will be reported in amounts on the scientific examination report generated by law enforcement. An expert will likely be able to give opinions based on their training and experience if a drug is within or outside of the therapeutic level. Further, an expert may be able to give opinions as to what impact those levels would generally have on an individual (all of which may be impacted by years of use, how often used, and biological factors concerning the person such as height, weight, etc.).

Why Oliverson Law DUI & Criminal Defense?