Transportation of Narcotic Drugs Lawyer in Arizona — Defense Under ARS 13-3408
Transportation of narcotic drugs in Arizona is governed by A.R.S. 13-3408(A)(7) and is one of the most serious felonies in the state criminal code. Once the amount transported equals or exceeds the threshold defined in A.R.S. 13-3401 paragraph 36 (1 gram for heroin, 9 grams for powder cocaine, 750 milligrams for crack cocaine, 9 grams for fentanyl), the charge is a Class 2 felony with mandatory prison under A.R.S. 13-3419. Sentencing under A.R.S. 13-702 ranges from 3 to 12.5 years for a first offense (presumptive 5 years). Cases originating at Arizona ports of entry frequently move federally under 21 U.S.C. 841, with mandatory minimums of 10 years for 50 grams or more of pure substance. Call (480) 582-3637 for a free consultation.
What Does Arizona Law Say About Transportation of Narcotic Drugs Under ARS 13-3408?
Arizona prosecutes narcotic-drug offenses under Arizona Revised Statutes 13-3408. “Narcotic drugs” are defined in ARS 13-3401 and include cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, and related opioid and cocaine-family substances. (Dangerous drugs — methamphetamine, MDMA, LSD, and similar scheduled substances — are prosecuted separately under ARS 13-3407. Marijuana is governed by ARS 13-3405 and Proposition 207.)
Transportation for sale or importation of a narcotic drug into Arizona is charged under ARS 13-3408(A)(7). The specific class and sentencing range depend on the substance, the quantity, any prior record, and whether the offense is charged as a threshold-amount case under ARS 13-3401(36).
Transportation cases most often begin with a highway traffic stop. Fourth Amendment challenges — the lawfulness of the stop, the scope and duration of a dog sniff, and the basis for any vehicle search — are the foundation of most defenses. Fentanyl cases raise additional forensic-testing challenges because of the known false-positive issues with field tests and the strict requirements for laboratory confirmation.
What Happens After a Narcotic Drugs Transportation Arrest in Arizona?
Arizona’s criminal process moves quickly, and the decisions made in the first 48 to 72 hours after an arrest shape the rest of the case. The exact timeline depends on the charge and the court, but most Arizona cases follow the same four stages.
Arrest and Initial Appearance
If you are arrested, Rule 4.1 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that you be brought before a judge for an Initial Appearance within 24 hours. That is when release conditions — bond, own-recognizance release, or pretrial detention — are set. Having counsel in place before the Initial Appearance can directly affect the conditions the court orders.
Arraignment and Plea Entry
Felony arraignments in Superior Court and misdemeanor arraignments in city or justice court are where the charges are formally read and a plea is entered. A not-guilty plea at arraignment preserves every defense and triggers the State’s disclosure obligations under Rule 15.
Pretrial Motions and Disclosure Review
This is the stage where most criminal cases are decided. Motions to suppress evidence, motions challenging the charging instrument, and review of police reports, body camera video, and witness statements all happen here. A successful suppression motion can end a case before trial.
Resolution: Plea, Diversion, Dismissal, or Trial
Most Arizona criminal cases resolve through a negotiated plea, a diversion program, or dismissal after a successful defense motion. When trial is the right path, Rule 8 sets time limits the State must meet. Our approach is to prepare every case as if it is going to trial, because that preparation is what produces better plea offers.
How Does Our Team Build Your Narcotic Drugs Transportation Defense?
An effective Arizona criminal defense is built around four questions: Was the State’s evidence lawfully obtained? Can the State prove every element of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt? Are there affirmative defenses or justifications that apply? And what resolution produces the best long-term outcome for the client? Every case we take is worked through this framework.
Challenging the Stop, Search, or Seizure
Fourth Amendment issues are where many Arizona criminal cases break down. Traffic stops without reasonable suspicion, searches beyond the scope of consent, and warrantless home entries without exigent circumstances all create suppression arguments under ARS 13-3925 and the Fourth Amendment.
Attacking the State’s Evidence
Chain of custody, lab testing protocols, officer credibility, body-camera gaps, and witness reliability are all challengeable. The State must prove every element of the charge beyond a reasonable doubt — breaking any single element ends the prosecution.
Raising Affirmative Defenses
Arizona recognizes self-defense under ARS 13-404, defense of a third person under ARS 13-406, defense of premises and property, necessity, duress, and mistake of fact. When the facts support it, we raise these defenses early and present them to the jury.
Negotiating From Trial-Ready Strength
Our preferred resolution is always dismissal or diversion. When a plea is the right outcome, we negotiate from the leverage created by trial preparation. Prosecutors move their offers when they see a defense that is ready to go.
Why Does Our Background Give You an Advantage?
Oliverson Law was founded in 2009 by Derek Oliverson, who brings a career spanning law enforcement, prosecution, and the judiciary. He earned his B.S. in Criminal Justice (magna cum laude) from Southern Utah University and his J.D. with a concentration in litigation from Creighton University School of Law. He was admitted to the Arizona Bar in October 2009.
Before founding the firm, Derek served as a police officer in Henderson, Nevada, worked as a criminal prosecutor in Mohave County, Arizona, and presided as a judge at both Page Magistrate Court (overseeing adjudication of 3,000+ cases annually) and Glendale City Court (starting in 2012, overseeing 40,000+ cases annually). He left the bench in 2014 to focus on criminal defense.
Attorney David Tangren is a graduate of the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law where he served as Note and Comment Editor on the International and Comparative Law Journal. Before joining Oliverson Law, David was a prosecutor at the Pima County Attorney’s Office, handling cases from misdemeanors through the felony trial team in the Property and Narcotics Bureau.
Which Arizona Counties and Cities Do We Serve?
Oliverson Law handles narcotic-drug transportation cases throughout Arizona from our main office at 60 E Rio Salado Pkwy, Suite 900, Tempe, AZ 85281. We appear regularly in courts across Maricopa County and Mohave County.
Maricopa County (Population: 4,551,524)
Maricopa County Superior Court at 201 W Jefferson St, Phoenix handles all felony cases. Misdemeanor cases are heard in the 26 justice court precincts and municipal courts located throughout the county, including regional facilities in Mesa (222 E Javelina Ave), Surprise (14264 W Tierra Buena Ln), and North Phoenix (18380 N 40th St).
Mohave County (Population: 222,255)
Mohave County Superior Court at 415 E Spring St in Kingman handles felony cases. Our founder Derek Oliverson began his legal career as a prosecutor in Mohave County and maintains direct familiarity with the local courts and procedures.
Maricopa CountyPima CountyPinal CountyYavapai CountyMohave CountyCoconino CountyYuma CountyCochise County
Frequently Asked Questions
Under ARS 13-3401, narcotic drugs include cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, and related opioid and cocaine-family substances. Dangerous drugs (methamphetamine, MDMA, LSD, psilocybin, and similar scheduled substances) are prosecuted separately under ARS 13-3407. Marijuana is governed by ARS 13-3405 and Proposition 207.
No. ARS 13-901.01 applies to simple-possession offenses on a first or second offense, not to transportation for sale, possession for sale, or manufacturing. Transportation cases carry significant prison exposure, which is why the defense focus is on suppression, for-sale-element challenges, and knowing-transportation challenges.
Fentanyl field tests have known false-positive issues, and Arizona law treats fentanyl pills as subject to specific threshold-quantity calculations under ARS 13-3401. The defense in a fentanyl case often turns on the forensic testing methodology and the confirmation-testing chain of custody.
Sometimes, yes. When the defense can break the “for sale” element — personal-use quantity, absence of sale paraphernalia, absence of distribution evidence — the charge can sometimes be reduced to simple possession, which in turn may qualify for Prop 200 probation-only sentencing on a first or second offense.
Sometimes. Large-quantity and interstate cases can be referred to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and prosecuted under 21 U.S.C. § 841. Federal sentencing under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines is typically more severe than state sentencing. We coordinate with federal counsel when appropriate.
Oliverson Law’s team includes a former judge (Glendale City Court), former prosecutors (Mohave County and Pima County), and a former police officer. That combined experience on the charging, prosecuting, and judicial sides of Arizona criminal cases is what informs our defense strategy. We have been defending Arizona criminal charges since the firm was founded in 2009.
Arizona DUI Defense1st Offense DUIExtreme DUIAggravated DUIDUI License ConsequencesIgnition Interlock
Arizona DUI Laws & PenaltiesHow Long Does a DUI Case Take?How Much Does a DUI Lawyer Cost?First Offense DUI PenaltiesIs a DUI a Felony in Arizona?About Derek OliversonCase Results
Derek Oliverson has presided over thousands of cases from the bench, prosecuted criminal cases in Mohave County, and patrolled streets as a police officer. Now he uses that experience to defend you.
Call (480) 582-3637Or request a free consultation online